gh-132661: docs: update PEP 750 section of What's New in 3.14 #137289
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I took a look. Very good improvement: the lead-in is simpler and better, the examples are better, and I certainly ❤️ the mention of returning an |
|
@AA-Turner Think we can get this in for RC3? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This issue requests revisiting the t-string section of "What's New in 3.14" now that t-string docs are starting to take shape.
I took a pass at this. It echos the latest wording elsewhere in our docs.
I wonder (a) if it's a little too HTML-centric (the current text is HTML-centric, too), and (b) if the
lower_upper()andhtml()examples are similar enough that we only need one of them.CC @AA-Turner and @lysnikolaou